Safety and Tolerability of Metastasis Directed Radiotherapy in the Era of Evolving Systemic, Immune and Targeted Therapies

Open AccessPublished:July 12, 2022DOI:


      Systemic, immune and target therapies are growing in use in the management of metastatic cancers. The aim of this review is to describe up to date published data on the safety and tolerability of metastasis directed hypo-fractionated radiotherapy (RT) when combined with newer systemic, immune and targeted therapies, and provide suggested strategies to mitigate potential toxicities in the clinical setting.

      Methods and materials

      A comprehensive search was performed between 1946 to August 2021 using pre-determined keywords describing the use of non-central nervous system palliative RT with commonly used targeted systemic therapies on Pubmed® and Medline® databases. A total of 1022 articles were screened, 130 met pre-specified criteria to be included in this review.


      BRAF and MEK inhibitors are reported to be toxic when given concurrently with RT and suspension 3 days and 1-2 days respectively prior and post RT is suggested. Cetuximab, Erlotinib/Gefitinib and Osimertinib were generally safe to use concomitantly with conventional radiation. But in a palliative/hypo-fractionated RT setting, suspending cetuximab during radiation week, Erlotinib/Gefitinib 1-2 days and Osimertinib ≥ 2 days pre and post RT is suggested. VEGF inhibitors such as bevacizumab reported substantial toxicities, suggestion is to suspend 4 weeks before and after radiation. Less data exists on sorafenib and sunitinib; 5 to 10 days suspension before and after RT should be considered. As a precaution, until further data is available, for CDK4-6 inhibitors, consideration to suspending of treatment 1-2 days before and after RT should be given. Ipilimumab should be suspended 2 days before and after RT and insufficient data exist for other immunotherapy agents. Trastuzumab and pertuzumab are generally safe to use in combination with RT, but insufficient data exist for other HER2 target therapy.


      Suggested approaches are described, using up to date literature, to aid clinicians navigate the integration of newer targeted agents with hypo-fractionated palliative and/or ablative metastatic RT. Further prospective studies are required.


      The use of cancer directed therapy is rapidly advancing, in the era of individualised patient directed care, and the emergence of numerous systemic, immune, and targeted therapies. For patients with metastatic disease, the role of radiation therapy (RT) is also evolving, with increasing interest in combining radiation with these newer systemic therapies to potentiate an anti-tumour immune response and in an effort to avoid interruptions of systemic treatment in patients metastatic disease1–3.
      Limited prospective safety and tolerability data exists when combining systemic therapies and RT in the metastatic setting. The aim of this review is to describe up to date published data on the safety and tolerability of metastasis directed hypo-fractionated RT when combined with newer systemic, immune, and targeted therapies, and provide suggested strategies to mitigate potential toxicities in the clinical setting.

      Methods and materials

      A comprehensive literature review from peer-reviewed journals was performed through PubMed® and Medline® from 1946 to August 2021. The search strategy restricted to English language and human subjects, with subject-specific keywords developed as per authors’ consensus (XX, XX). Controlled vocabulary terms were used when available referring to palliative RT, SBRT, bone metastases, targeted therapy, check-point inhibitor, BRAF inhibitor, MEK inhibitor, immunotherapy, PD-1 inhibitor, PDL-1 inhibitor, tyrosine kinase inhibitor and CDK4-6 inhibitor (Appendix 1 for completed list). The most recent search was performed May, 17th, 2022. Of 1029 screened articles, only prospective, retrospective studies, case reports where the aforementioned treatments and RT were used concomitantly or sequentially with discussion of radiation induced toxicity, were reviewed. A limited number of articles using conventional non-metastatic RT combined with contemporary systemic therapies were discussed in this paper where there was an absence of data in the palliative RT or SBRT setting. A total of 907 studies were excluded where RT to the central nervous systems was delivered or radionuclide therapy was used and if safety data was not available. A further eight publications were added from the authors own library. A total of 130 publications were selected.
      Publications including typically used palliative and/or metastatic directed RT fractionation regimens - moderate (defined as >2.2 Gray (Gy) per fraction (fr)) and ultrahypofactionation (defined as ≥5 Gy per fr (≤10 fr))4 (with SBRT specified as ≤6 fr) were included in this analysis. These two regimens are typically used in the palliative and metastatic disease setting. The toxicities were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0 or higher)5 when information was available.


      Publications were divided according to class of systemic agent. Based on the limited data available, suggested toxicity mitigation strategies were proposed (Table 1) for each class. When relevant palliative studies were not available, curative intent trials were primarily used and finally when neither of the above were available, the drug's elimination half-life (as it leads to the elimination of more than 95% of the drug6) was considered to guide clinical practice.
      Table 1Summary of Suggested Approaches
      BRAF and MEK inhibitorVemurafenib and Dabrafenib

      Suspend 3 days before and after RT.

      Suspend 1-2 days before and after RT.
      EGFR and ALK inhibitorCetuximab

      Erlotinib and Gefetinib

      Crizotinib and Osimertinib
      Suspend the week of radiation if SBRT.

      Suspend 1-2 days before and after RT.

      Suspend ≥2 days before and after RT.
      VEGF inhibitorBevacizumab

      Sorafenib and Sunitinib
      Suspend 4 weeks before and after RT.

      Suspend 5-10 days before and after RT.
      CDK 4-6 inhibitorPalbociclib and RibociclibSuspend 3 days before and after RT.

      Suspend 2 days before and after RT if 8 Gy in single fraction to bone

      Insufficient data to recommend with moderate and ultrafractionation RT, caution suggested on an individual basis.
      HER2 target therapyTrastuzumab and Pertuzumab


      Generally safe to use concomitantly with RT.

      Insufficient data to recommend with moderate and ultrafractionation RT, caution suggested on an individual basis.

      Insufficient data to recommend with moderate and ultrafractionation RT, caution suggested on an individual basis.
      RT= radiation therapy

      Radiotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitor agents

      Vemurafenib and dabrafenib are the two most commonly used BRAF-inhibitors, mainly in the management of metastatic melanoma. They are shown to be associated with in vitro radiosensitization7,8 and have a t ½ of 57 hours9 (range 30 to 120 hours) and 8 hours9 respectively.
      When BRAF inhibitors are combined with RT, the most commonly report side effect is dermatitis, occurring during or within 7 days of RT10–23. In addition to acute skin toxicities, there have been a number of case reports of radiation recall, associated with systemic agents that have started more than 7 days from RT completion,with no Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 higher toxicity reported, and subsequently managed conservatively10,24–29. All CTCAE grade 3 toxicities happened when the BRAF inhibitor was given concurrently or within 2 days of radiation15, and when high dose RT was given (eg. 71 Gy in 28 fr)27. A dose threshold has not been reported, but from retrospective data by Churilla et al, when treating with 30 Gy in 10 fr, the estimated dose received by the skin was 23-31 Gy, resulting in a grade 3 dermatitis30.
      Non-dermatologic toxicities are less commonly reported in the literature (Appendix 2). Anker et al. reported a CTCAE grade 5 hepatic hemorrhage which occurred following 20 Gy in 5 fr using parallel opposed beam radiation delivered to T10 toL1 vertebral body15. However, the direct causality was unclear due to the growing number and size of known liver metastases, and the low dose of radiation received by the liver (liver mean dose = 2.7 Gy). Underling liver function was not reported, but additional data suggests avoiding direct liver irradiation when patients on BRAF inhibitors present with a Child-Pugh B7 and higher score31. A CTCAE grade 5 toxicity, reported by Baroudjia et al11, resulted in a hemothorax one month after palliative right axillary RT using 20 Gy in 4 fr. Reassuringly, they also reported another similar case that had no toxicities with a higher dose of 30 Gy in 6 fr. Two cases of CTACE grade 2 pneumonitis with combined vemurafenib and chest irradiation were reported, but the authors were unable to differentiate if toxicities were solely drug related or not32. A patient who received concurrent Vemurafenib with palliative RT to the left neck 50 Gy in 20 fr developed a CTCAE grade 3 oral mucositis and dermatitis12. According to the authors this toxicity was not expected with the oral cavity receiving at most 12 Gy. Hecht et al reported only 2 patients (2%) with grade 3 oesophagitis with parenteral nutrition needs in their series on spine irradiation with patient with melanoma16.
      Trametinib is a MEK-inhibitor targeting the MAPK pathway, used frequently in combination with dabrafenib and mainly used in melanoma and anaplastic thyroid cancer. It has a t ½ of 4-5 hours9. Little information on the use as a monotherapy therefore exists.
      A recent phase 2 study by Zhu et al33, compared pancreatic cancer SBRT 35 Gy in 5 fr, in the setting of locally recurrent pancreatic cancer, with pembrolizumab and trametinib versus gemcitabine concurrently. Reported toxicities were more commonly seen in the SBRT plus pembrolizumab and trametinib arm, with CTCAE grade 3-4 increased liver enzymes (12% vs 7%) and increased bilirubin (5% vs 0%), with no treatment related deaths occurred. However, hepatotoxicity is not a common side effect of trametinib, and authors believed the reported toxicity likely arose from the pembrolizumab. No toxicities have been reported with this drug combination with conventional RT34. A case of CTCAE grade 4 bowel perforation was described at 1 month after palliative RT (20 Gy in 5 fr) with dabrafenib and trametinib which was started 10 days after radiation29.
      A recent phase I/II study35 evaluated the use of Dabrafenib and trametinib in patients with metastatic melanoma receiving palliative radiation (20 Gy in 5 fr and 30 Gy in 10 fr). Two patients included in the study received 20 Gy in 5 fr using 3D conformal RT to the lumbar spine and right ilium/L1 vertebra respectively, without any significant gastrointestinal toxicities reported by 12 months.

      Summary and Suggested Toxicity Mitigation Strategies

      Guidelines from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) and based on data outlined above, suspension of BRAF inhibitors 3 days before and after radiation29 should be considered mainly to avoid skin toxicity. There is insufficient published data to provide a recommendation for MEK-inhibitors. Based on trametinib's t ½, 1-2 days pre and post RT might be sufficient.

      Radiotherapy and EGFR/ALK inhibitor agents

      Commonly used epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors include cetuximab, erlotinib, gefitinib and osimertinib, with t ½ of 112, 36.2, 48 and 48 hours respectively9. Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR, whereas the other agents are receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Crizotinib is an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors with t ½ of 42 hours9. ALK TKIs have been reported to potentiate the effect of lung injury when the lungs are within the RT target volume36. Studies primarily involving the use of these agents in combination with RT for the treatment of head and neck, colorectal and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are summarized in Appendix 3.
      There is a lack of data reporting the use of cetuximab combined with hypo-fractionated and/or palliative RT. The majority of evidence describes cetuximab in combination with radical, conventionally fractionated RT for locally advanced head and neck cancer. These studies report a 6%-36% risk of CTCAE grade 3 or higher skin reaction, which is significantly increased with cetuximab compared to cisplatin37–40. In the palliative setting, only one case has reported a grade 3 oesophagitis when 5-FU/cisplatin and cetuximab were combined with 30 Gy in 10 fr spine RT 41. A retrospective study reported no CTCAE grade 3 or higher toxicity42 when hypofractionated RT was used in three patients with metastatic head and neck cancer 42. Other studies reporting head and neck SBRT delivered concomitantly with cetuximab were in recurrent settings43–45. Concomitant cetuximab with conventionally chest fractionated thorax RT has been studied in two phase 2 studies without major safety concerns46,47, and with conventionally fractionated RT to the rectum with a 5-38% rate of CTCAE grade 3-4 diarrhea48.
      Numerous prospective studies have investigated the role of conventionally fractionated RT in combination with erlotinib and gefitinib, reporting CTCAE grade 3 ≤ toxicities related to nausea, skin, oesophagitis and pneumonitis 49–60. Weickhardt et al.61, Gan et al.62 and Borghetti et al.63 published retrospective studies treating different metastatic sites from gastro-intestinal cancers with concurrent erlotinib or crizotinib using SBRT and hypofractionated palliative RT, no CTCAE grade 3 or higher toxicity was reported. In the multi-institutional phase II study written by Gomez et al.1, treating patients with oligometastatic NSCLC without progression after front-line systemic therapy, two patients received SBRT concurrently with crizotinib, reported toxicities were similar to patients who did not receive concomitant therapy. Gefitinib has also been used in combination with lung SBRT in a retrospective study of 122 elderly patients with no pneumonitis reported64. In a phase II trial by Swanimath et al. the safety of palliative hypofractionated thorax RT (30 Gy in 10 fr) with concurrent Erlotinib was demonstrated with only one CTCAE grade 3 nausea and one CTACE grade 4 dermatitis reported65. However, a Chinese study published a high rate of CTCAE grade 3 or higher radiation pneumonitis (54%), including one death, when osimertinib was combined with palliative lung RT (30-60 Gy in 10-30 fr) 52.

      Summary and Suggested Toxicity Mitigation Strategies

      Cetuximab is commonly used with conventionally fractionated RT, however in the setting of hypo-fractionated RT, due to the long t ½ and paucity of toxicity data, omitting it during the week of radiation treatment is suggest. Erlotinib and gefitinib have been reported as safe with conventionally fractionated RT, but in absence of supportive data in the setting of palliative/metastasis directed RT, a washout period of 1-2 days before starting radiation is suggested. Due to lack of prospective data, combining crizotinib or osimertinib with RT is cautioned and a washout period of at least 2 days is recommended. In cases where radiation is delivered to the lung, attention should be given to lung dosimetry, especially in the setting of patient with interstitial pneumonitis.

      VEGF inhibitor agents

      Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds and neutralizes vascular endothelial growth factor VEFG-A with a t ½ of 20 days9. It is most commonly used in the management of gynecological, colorectal and hepatocellular malignancies (Appendix 4).
      Bleeding after surgery in patients receiving bevacizumab have been commonly reported. A meta-analysis66 described the incidence of gastro-intestinal perforation of 1% with associated mortality rate of 21% in patients receiving bevacizumab, with history of prior radiation reported as a risk factor. Barney et al.67 further reported a 9% rate of serious bowel injury (CTCAE grade 3-4 GI ulceration, CTCAE grade 4-5 GI perforation) post SBRT (median dose: 50 Gy in 5 fr), in patients who received VEGF inhibitors before and after radiation, with reported toxicities higher (up to 35%) when systemic therapy was given after radiation. No clinically significant CTCAE grade 3 or higher bowel toxicities occurred in patients not receiving VEGF inhibitor after SBRT. These findings suggest a synergistically deleterious effect with the combination of VEGF inhibitors and SBRT. Note that no toxicities were reported when a maximum bowel dose of 18 Gy was recorded,
      Sorafenib and sunitinib are multi-receptor TKIs targeting, among others, the kinase c-raf, VEGFfr 2/3 and PDGF-alpha, with a t ½ of 25 to 48 hours and 40 to 60 hours respectively9. These agents are mostly used in hepatocellular carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor and thyroid carcinoma Appendix 4.
      Peters et al68 reported a CTCAE grade 5 bowel perforation with a single dose of palliative RT to the spine (8 Gy in 1 fr) when sorafenib was stopped 2 days prior to radiation and re-started 3 days post. Murray et al69 reported severe toxicities with concurrent sorafenib and palliative radiation (30 Gy in 10 fr), as one CTCAE grade 3 oesophagitis, one CTCAE grade 3 transaminase elevation and one CTCAE grade 5 bowel perforation (tumor was invading the bowel in this case). Two phase I studies70-71 showed that concurrent sorafenib with liver SBRT resulted in clinically meaningful toxicities, such as gastrointestinal bleeding.
      A phase II trial72 published important gastro-intestinal toxicities associated with a combination of sunitinib and SBRT (50 Gy in 10 fr) for oligometastatic disease. Also, Staehler et al.73 studied the association of sorafenib and sunitinib with spine stereotactic radiosurgery (20 Gy in 1 fr), reporting one CTCAE grade 3 bleeds and one CTCAE grade 5 gastrointestinal hemorrhage, that was considered likely related to sunitinib rather than RT.

      Summary and Suggested Toxicity Mitigation Strategies

      Combining VEGF inhibitors agents with any fractionation schedule of radiation appears unsafe. Bevacizumab should be stopped at least 4 weeks prior to RT and recommence at least 4 weeks post RT. For TKIs targeting VEGF, at least 5 to 10 days pre and post RT should be considered especially if gastrointestinal mucosa is within the irradiated field.

      CDK4-6 inhibitor agents

      Palbociclib is a reversible small molecule cyclin-dependant kinase inhibitor selective for CDK 4 and 6, which has a role in regulating progression through the cell cycle and has a t ½ of 29 hours9. Ribociclib and abemaciclib are CDK 4-6 inhibitors with t ½ of 30 to 55 hours and 18.3 hours9.
      Few retrospective data74–81 exist on the used of CDK4/6 inhibitors (Appendix 5) in combination with RT. Beddock et al.82 evaluate the combination of palbociclib and RT in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Palliative metastases were treated with standard palliative regimens to 17 vertebral body metastasis, 7 peripheral bone metastasis and 1 choroidal metastasis. One patient had CTCAE grade 3 pain after radiation, 2 patients needed to stop palbociclib during RT due to CTCAE grade 3 dermatitis and CTCAE grade 2 dysphagia. No late toxicity was described. In three patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with palliative lung RT (20 Gy in 5 fr) concurrently with palbociclib, two patients developed radiation pneumonitis refractory to corticosteroids and all developed pulmonary fibrosis76. Norman et al. demonstrate higher CTCAE grade 3 lymphopenia during cycle 1 of palbociclib in patients with breast cancer receiving 20-30 Gy in 5-10 fr RT within 1 year of palpociclib; patients who received 10 fr were more likely to have cycle one interrupted than those receiving shorter radiation courses83.
      A single-center retrospective study84 was published on the use of concomitant palbociclib (50%), ribociclib (33%) and abemaciclib (17%) with multi-site palliative RT in patients with metastatic breast cancer. RT was mostly well tolerated, with one patient who received30 Gy in 10 fr to the pelvis developing a CTCAE grade 3 ileitis requiring hospitalisation. The patient subsequently recovered. Two other CTCAE grade 3 colitis were reported with concomitant palbociclib and 30 Gy in 10 fr to the pelvis85,86. Interestingly, Lee et al. reported that due to higher surviving crypts in the small intestine, a protective GI effect of CDK4/6 inhibitors was found when delivered prior to a single fr of RT compare to fractionated RT which led to an increased risk of GI toxicity87.

      Summary and Suggested Toxicity Mitigation Strategies

      Based on the limited, largely retrospective data available, stopping CDK 4-6 inhibitor 3 days before and after radiation is suggested.

      Immune checkpoint inhibitors - CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors

      Immune checkpoint inhibitors work to remove inhibitory signals between tumor cells and T cells, igniting an immune response. Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, such as ipilimumab are thought to act early in the immune cycle and primarily in lymph nodes. Furthermore, CTLA-4 inhibitors are believed to remove immunosuppressive molecules such as T-Regulatory cells88. The t ½ for ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab is 15.4, 25 and 22 days respectively9. PD-L-1 inhibitors such as durvalumab, atezolizumab and avelumab have a t ½ of 18, 27 and 6.1 days respectively9 (Appendix 6).
      Immunotherapy appears generally safe with minimal side-effects reported in patients who received conventionally fractionated RT in combination with durvalumab89 (pneumonitis), pembrolizumab90,91 and nivolumab92 (pneumonitis, oesophageal fistulation).
      Luke et al93 described a 10% incidence of CTACE grade 3 or more radiation related toxicities in a phase I study of patients who received pembrolizumab within 7 days of SBRT. Three CTCAE grade 3 pneumonitis, two CTCAE grade 3 colitis and one CTCAE grade 3 hepatic toxicity all within the radiation field were reported. In the setting of metastatic NSCLC, a phase 1 trial94 and PEMBRO-RT95 suggested that combining RT with pembrolizumab was well tolerated. One patient developed a nephritis post SBRT to a retroperitoneal lesion, which was close to the kidney after a third course of pembrolizumab, and another patient developed a vertebral body compression fracture post spine SBRT. Ho et al.92 in a similar phase II trial, using SBRT (30 Gy in 5 fr) concomitant with pembrolizumab to treat a patient with metastatic triple negative breast cancer, tolerable adverse effects were reported with no CTCAE grade 3 or higher toxicities. A recent phase 2 trial of palliative RT (30 Gy in 10 fr) to the esophagus delivered concomitantly with pembrolizumab, showed one CTCAE grade 3 diarrhea and one CTCAE grade 4 enterocolitis that required discontinuation treatment96.
      In addition to the many retrospective studies97–101, four prospective studies evaluated palliative RT with ipilimumab and described a rate of14-34% of CTACE grade 3 or higher toxicities102–105, similar to drug-related toxicities only in other studies. An incidence of1% CTCAE grade 5 immune-related bowel perforation was reported in Kwon et al phase III trial103 that studied ipilimumab versus placebo within 2 days prior to RT in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that had progressed after docetaxel chemotherapy. It was not associated with patients who received pelvic RT and toxicities rates are again all consistent with published drug-only treatment literature106.
      In the metastatic setting, nivolumab with moderate and ultra-hypofractionation appear to be safe with less than 13% CTCAE grade 3 toxicities reported in several studies, and no grade 4-5 toxicities101,107–110. With a median follow-up of 10 months, similar radiation pneumonitis rates were reported when immune checkpoint inhibitors were given within a year of palliative RT (30 Gy in 10 fr) to the thorax111. Interestingly, two cases of radiation recall pneumonitis have been reported up to 2 years after radiation with nivolumab112.

      Summary and Suggested Toxicity Mitigation Strategies

      Several studies have reported that the combination of immunotherapy and palliative/hypo-fractionated RT have a potentially positive synergistic effects, while also suggesting safety in this setting. Data exists suggesting the safety of stopping Ipilimumab within 2 days of single fr (8Gy) RT to the bone. However, caution should be considered for other immunotherapy agents that are less well described, with particular attention recommended when considering the RT field of treatment (e.g. lungs, abdomen).

      HER2 target therapies

      Trastuzumab and pertuzumab

      Trastuzumab is a humanized recombinant monoclonal antibody binding the extracellular domain of HER2 receptors currently used with breast cancer. Pertuzumab is a recombinant humanized IgG antibody that blocks dimerization receptors and thereby HER2-dependent signaling pathway113. Estimated half-life is 28113 and 18 days9 respectively.
      As the first anti-HER2 molecule used in clinical practice, much data exists on the safety and toxicity of combining trastuzumab and conventional RT, specifically with breast114–120 and esophagus121,122. Hypofractionation up to 42,4 Gy in16 fr appears safe based on retrospective study123. To the best of our knowledge, there is no current data describing the combination of for ultra-hypofractionated breast RT with trastuzumab.
      One case report124 in the literature described a CTCAE grade 3 radiation enteritis after palliative moderately fractionated radiation with HER2 target therapy in a patient with metastatic breast cancer who was treated to the fifth lumbar vertebra and left hip. The patient developed greater than expected radiation gastroenteritis after 24 Gy in a 30 Gy plan. Another grade 3 gastroenteritis was described one month after 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to a pancreas metastasis from a breast cancer124. Only one retrospective study evaluate trastuzumab plus pertuzumab with concomitant RT in metastatic breast cancer114. With palliative dose, one patient treated with 15 Gy in 5 fr to thoracic vertebra level 8-11 developed an asymptomatic decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction (below 50%), 8 months after RT (heart mean dose 4.46 Gy). This patient also had other risk factors; previous right-side breast/locoregional RT and had received epirubicine. The HER2 regimen was stopped for 3 months, and the patient recovered. Other CTCAE grade 3 toxicities described in this paper where when higher conventionally fractionated doses were used. (Appendix 7)

      Summary and Suggested Toxicity Mitigation Strategies

      Trastuzumab may be delivered concurrently with radiation, with attention to heart dosimetry suggested. Pertuzumab is often used in combination with trastuzumab, and toxicity rate associated with radiation appear similar, but limited data exists.


      Lapatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that acts as a reversible inhibitor of the phosphorylation in the intracellular domain of the HER1/HER2 and downstream receptors. It has a t ½ of 24 hours9.
      There is little data reporting toxicity outcomes when combining Lapatinib with hypofractionated RT. A number of phase I and II studies using conventionally fractionated RT have most commonly reported dermatological side-effect onlys125–128.

      Summary and Suggested Toxicity Mitigation Strategies

      To the best of our knowledge, there is no data reporting lapatinib being used in combination with hypofractionated or palliative RT, the use of the half-life of lapatinib is suggested until further data becomes available to mitigate potential side-effects.


      T-DM1 is a systemic therapy combining trastuzumab with mertansine that inhibits mitosis, with a half-life of 3.5 days9, most commonly used in HER-2 positive breast cancer.
      The majority of existing data is when T-DM1 is combined with conventionally fractionated RT 129–133. Side-effects reported in this setting are minimal (radiation dermatitis, pneumonitis and cardiac toxicities) and safety has been reported when administrated with concurrent RT in a recent systemic review134.

      Summary and Suggested Toxicity Mitigation Strategies

      Limited data exists for patients receiving palliative RT concurrently with T-DM1. Combination with conventional fractionation appears safe.


      Limited data exists assessing the safety and tolerability of combined palliative RT regimens in patients with metastatic disease receiving systemic, immune and targeted therapies, as summarised in this review. There is also a lack of reported radiation therapy data, with very few studies detailing normal tissue dose volume histograms, planning parameters and delivered dose, limiting more sensitive analysis. Furthermore, much of the published data used a combination of systemic therapies (versus mono-therapy), making it difficult to establish the cause and effect of therapies alone or combination. Reporting bias is reflected by only published data being available for review with, real-time clinical data may not be reflected accurately.
      Deciding on an appropriate washout period requires consultation with the multi-disciplinary team, including medical oncology, to determine the risk/benefit ratio in continuing systemic therapies, especially in the setting of urgent or emergency palliative RT and patients with oligo-progressive disease on continuous systemic therapy.


      There is an urgent need for further prospective data reporting the safety, efficacy, and ideal timing of concurrent systemic, targeted and immune therapies with moderate and ultra-hypo-fractionated RT in the palliative setting.

      Declaration of interests

      The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.


      • 1
        Gomez DR, Tang C, Zhang J, et al. Local Consolidative Therapy Vs. Maintenance Therapy or Observation for Patients With Oligometastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Multi-Institutional, Phase II, Randomized Study. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2019;37(18):1558-1565. doi:10.1200/JCO.19.00201
      • 2
        Lehrer EJ, Singh R, Wang M, et al. Safety and Survival Rates Associated With Ablative Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Patients With Oligometastatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(1):92-106. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6146
      • 3
        Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus standard of care palliative treatment in patients with oligometastatic cancers (SABR-COMET): a randomised, phase 2, open-label trial. Lancet (London, England). 2019;393(10185):2051-2058. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32487-5
      • 4
        Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO, ASCO, and AUA Evidence-Based Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018;8(6):354-360. doi:10.1016/j.prro.2018.08.002
      • 5
        Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP). Accessed January 15, 2022.
      • 6
        Thariat J, Kirova Y, Milano G, Mornex F. [Combination of stereotactic irradiation and chemotherapy or targeted therapies: state of the art and preliminary recommendations]. Cancer Radiother. 2014;18(4):270-279. doi:10.1016/j.canrad.2014.05.007
      • 7
        Dasgupta T, Haas-Kogan DA, Yang X, et al. Genotype-dependent cooperation of ionizing radiation with BRAF inhibition in BRAF V600E-mutated carcinomas. Invest New Drugs. 2013;31(5):1136-1141. doi:10.1007/s10637-013-9928-9
      • 8
        Sambade MJ, Peters EC, Thomas NE, Kaufmann WK, Kimple RJ, Shields JM. Melanoma cells show a heterogeneous range of sensitivity to ionizing radiation and are radiosensitized by inhibition of B-RAF with PLX-4032. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 2011;98(3):394-399. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.12.017
      • 9
        Lexi-Drugs. Lexicomp app. UpToDate Inc. Accessed August 12, 2022.
      • 10
        Wang CM, Fleming KF, Hsu S. A case of vemurafenib-induced keratosis pilaris-like eruption. Dermatol Online J. 2012;18(4):7.
      • 11
        Baroudjian B, Boussemart L, Routier E, et al. Dramatic response to radiotherapy combined with vemurafenib. Is vemurafenib a radiosensitizer? Eur J Dermatol. 2014;24(2):265-267. doi:10.1684/ejd.2014.2300
      • 12
        Wallach JB, Rietschel P, Kalnicki S, Fox JL. BRAF inhibitor (vemurafenib) concurrent with radiation therapy for metastatic melanoma producing severe skin and oral cavity reactions. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014;4(5):e213-e216. doi:10.1016/j.prro.2013.10.007
      • 13
        Schulze B, Meissner M, Wolter M, Rödel C, Weiss C. Unusual acute and delayed skin reactions during and after whole-brain radiotherapy in combination with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. Two case reports. Strahlenther Onkol. 2014;190(2):229-232. doi:10.1007/s00066-013-0474-3
      • 14
        Satzger I, Degen A, Asper H, Kapp A, Hauschild A, Gutzmer R. Serious skin toxicity with the combination of BRAF inhibitors and radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2013;31(13):e220-2. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.44.4265
      • 15
        Anker CJ, Ribas A, Grossmann AH, et al. Severe liver and skin toxicity after radiation and vemurafenib in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2013;31(17):e283-7. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.44.7755
      • 16
        Hecht M, Zimmer L, Loquai C, et al. Radiosensitization by BRAF inhibitor therapy-mechanism and frequency of toxicity in melanoma patients. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2015;26(6):1238-1244. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv139
      • 17
        Houriet C, Klass ND, Beltraminelli H, Borradori L, Oberholzer PA. Localized Epidermal Cysts as a Radiation Recall Phenomenon in a Melanoma Patient Treated with Radiotherapy and the BRAF Inhibitor Vemurafenib. Case Rep Dermatol. 2014;6(3):213-217. doi:10.1159/000367708
      • 18
        Lang N, Sterzing F, Enk AH, Hassel JC. Cutis verticis gyrata-like skin toxicity during treatment of melanoma patients with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib after whole-brain radiotherapy is a consequence of the development of multiple follicular cysts and milia. Strahlenther Onkol. 2014;190(11):1080-1081. doi:10.1007/s00066-014-0707-0
      • 19
        Levy A, Hollebecque A, Bourgier C, et al. Targeted therapy-induced radiation recall. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(7):1662-1668. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.009
      • 20
        Peuvrel L, Ruellan A-L, Thillays F, et al. Severe radiotherapy-induced extracutaneous toxicity under vemurafenib. Eur J Dermatol. 2013;23(6):879-881. doi:10.1684/ejd.2013.2193
      • 21
        Pulvirenti T, Hong A, Clements A, et al. Acute Radiation Skin Toxicity Associated With BRAF Inhibitors. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2016;34(3):e17-20. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.49.0565
      • 22
        Reigneau M, Granel-Brocard F, Geoffrois L, et al. Efflorescence of scalp cysts during vemurafenib treatment following brain radiation therapy: a radiation recall dermatitis? Eur J Dermatol. 2013;23(4):544-545. doi:10.1684/ejd.2013.2108
      • 23
        Saco M, Mitchell C. Severe radiation dermatitis associated with concomitant vemurafenib therapy in a patient with metastatic melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(6):e135-6. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.10.046
      • 24
        Harding JJ, Barker CA, Carvajal RD, Wolchok JD, Chapman PB, Lacouture ME. Cutis verticis gyrata in association with vemurafenib and whole-brain radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2014;32(14):e54-6. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.49.3528
      • 25
        Boussemart L, Boivin C, Claveau J, et al. Vemurafenib and radiosensitization. JAMA dermatology. 2013;149(7):855-857. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.4200
      • 26
        Yilmaz M, Celik U, Hascicek S. Radiation recall dermatitis with dabrafenib and trametinib: A case report. World J Clin cases. 2020;8(3):522-526. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v8.i3.522
      • 27
        Braunstein I, Gangadhar TC, Elenitsas R, Chu EY. Vemurafenib-induced interface dermatitis manifesting as radiation-recall and a keratosis pilaris-like eruption. J Cutan Pathol. 2014;41(6):539-543. doi:10.1111/cup.12318
      • 28
        Conen K, Mosna-Firlejczyk K, Rochlitz C, et al. Vemurafenib-induced radiation recall dermatitis: case report and review of the literature. Dermatology. 2015;230(1):1-4. doi:10.1159/000365918
      • 29
        Anker CJ, Grossmann KF, Atkins MB, Suneja G, Tarhini AA, Kirkwood JM. Avoiding Severe Toxicity From Combined BRAF Inhibitor and Radiation Treatment: Consensus Guidelines from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;95(2):632-646. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.038
      • 30
        Churilla TM, Chowdhry VK, Pan D, de la Roza G, Damron T, Lacombe MA. Radiation-induced dermatitis with vemurafenib therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013;3(4):e195-8. doi:10.1016/j.prro.2012.11.012
      • 31
        Pan CC, Kavanagh BD, Dawson LA, et al. Radiation-associated liver injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3 Suppl):S94-100. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.092
      • 32
        Forschner A, Zips D, Schraml C, et al. Radiation recall dermatitis and radiation pneumonitis during treatment with vemurafenib. Melanoma Res. 2014;24(5):512-516. doi:10.1097/CMR.0000000000000078
      • 33
        Zhu X, Cao Y, Liu W, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy plus pembrolizumab and trametinib versus stereotactic body radiotherapy plus gemcitabine for locally recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgical resection: an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(8):1093-1102. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00286-2
      • 34
        Wu C, Williams TM, Robb R, et al. Phase I Trial of Trametinib with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Clin cancer Res an Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2020;26(13):3117-3125. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-4193
      • 35
        Wang W, Smith JL, Carlino MS, et al. Phase I/II trial of concurrent extracranial palliative radiation therapy with Dabrafenib and Trametinib in metastatic BRAF V600E/K mutation-positive cutaneous Melanoma. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2021;30:95-99. doi:10.1016/j.ctro.2021.08.006
      • 36
        Pellegrino B, Facchinetti F, Bordi P, Silva M, Gnetti L, Tiseo M. Lung Toxicity in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Exposed to ALK Inhibitors: Report of a Peculiar Case and Systematic Review of the Literature. Clin Lung Cancer. 2018;19(2):e151-e161. doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2017.10.008
      • 37
        Gillison ML, Trotti AM, Harris J, et al. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab or cisplatin in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (NRG Oncology RTOG 1016): a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Lancet (London, England). 2019;393(10166):40-50. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32779-X
      • 38
        Mehanna H, Robinson M, Hartley A, et al. Radiotherapy plus cisplatin or cetuximab in low-risk human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (De-ESCALaTE HPV): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet (London, England). 2019;393(10166):51-60. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32752-1
      • 39
        Gebre-Medhin M, Brun E, Engström P, et al. ARTSCAN III: A Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Chemoradiotherapy With Cisplatin Versus Cetuximab in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2021;39(1):38-47. doi:10.1200/JCO.20.02072
      • 40
        Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, et al. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(1):21-28. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70311-0
      • 41
        Chiba T, Ohashi Y, Tsunoda N, et al. Radiation Esophagitis in a Patient with Oral Carcinoma and Bone Metastasis. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2020;14(3):453-457. doi:10.1159/000508930
      • 42
        Gamez ME, Agarwal M, Hu KS, Lukens JN, Harrison LB. Hypofractionated Palliative Radiotherapy with Concurrent Radiosensitizing Chemotherapy for Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Using the “QUAD-SHOT Regimen”. Anticancer Res. 2017;37(2):685-691. doi:10.21873/anticanres.11364
      • 43
        Vargo JA, Ferris RL, Ohr J, et al. A prospective phase 2 trial of reirradiation with stereotactic body radiation therapy plus cetuximab in patients with previously irradiated recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91(3):480-488. doi:
      • 44
        Lartigau EF, Tresch E, Thariat J, et al. Multi institutional phase II study of concomitant stereotactic reirradiation and cetuximab for recurrent head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2013;109(2):281-285. doi:
      • 45
        Gebhardt BJ, Vargo JA, Ling D, et al. Carotid Dosimetry and the Risk of Carotid Blowout Syndrome After Reirradiation With Head and Neck Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;101(1):195-200. doi:
      • 46
        Jensen AD, Munter MW, Bischoff HG, et al. Combined treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer NSCLC stage III with intensity-modulated RT radiotherapy and cetuximab: the NEAR trial. Cancer. 2011;117(13):2986-2994. doi:
      • 47
        Ramalingam SS, Kotsakis A, Tarhini AA, et al. A multicenter phase II study of cetuximab in combination with chest radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2013;81(3):416-421. doi:
      • 48
        Glynne-Jones R, Hadaki M, Harrison M. The status of targeted agents in the setting of neoadjuvant radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancers. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013;4(3):264-284. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2013.037
      • 49
        Erlotinib Hydrochloride or Crizotinib and Chemoradiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Https://
      • 50
        Zhang X, Xie C, Li W, Zhang P, Wu S. [Phase II study of radiotherapy plus erlotinib for elder patients with esophageal carcinoma]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012;92(23):1615-1617.
      • 51
        Xie C, Jing Z, Luo H, et al. Chemoradiotherapy with extended nodal irradiation and/or erlotinib in locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell cancer: long-term update of a randomised phase 3 trial. Br J Cancer. 2020;123(11):1616-1624. doi:10.1038/s41416-020-01054-6
      • 52
        Jia W, Guo H, Jing W, et al. An especially high rate of radiation pneumonitis observed in patients treated with thoracic radiotherapy and simultaneous osimertinib. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 2020;152:96-100. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.051
      • 53
        Zhai Y, Hui Z, Wang J, et al. Concurrent erlotinib and radiotherapy for chemoradiotherapy-intolerant esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: results of a pilot study. Dis esophagus Off J Int Soc Dis Esophagus. 2013;26(5):503-509. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01380.x
      • 54
        Iyer R, Chhatrala R, Shefter T, et al. Erlotinib and radiation therapy for elderly patients with esophageal cancer - clinical and correlative results from a prospective multicenter phase 2 trial. Oncology. 2013;85(1):53-58. doi:10.1159/000351617
      • 55
        Xu Y, Zheng Y, Sun X, et al. Concurrent radiotherapy with gefitinib in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Preliminary results of a phase II study. Oncotarget. 2015;6(35):38429-38439. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.5193
      • 56
        Ready N, Jänne PA, Bogart J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy and gefitinib in stage III non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor and KRAS mutation analysis: cancer and leukemia group B (CALEB) 30106, a CALGB-stratified phase II trial. J Thorac Oncol Off Publ Int Assoc Study Lung Cancer. 2010;5(9):1382-1390. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181eba657
      • 57
        Martínez E, Martínez M, Rico M, et al. Feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of the concurrent addition of erlotinib to thoracic radiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a Phase II trial. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:1057-1066. doi:10.2147/OTT.S89755
      • 58
        Song T, Du D, Zhang X, Fang M, Wu S. Comparative study of radiotherapy plus erlotinib versus chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. Dis esophagus Off J Int Soc Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(9):1-10. doi:10.1093/dote/dox060
      • 59
        Lilenbaum R, Samuels M, Wang X, et al. A phase II study of induction chemotherapy followed by thoracic radiotherapy and erlotinib in poor-risk stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: results of CALGB 30605 (Alliance)/RTOG 0972 (NRG). J Thorac Oncol Off Publ Int Assoc Study Lung Cancer. 2015;10(1):143-147. doi:10.1097/JTO.0000000000000347
      • 60
        Wu S-X, Wang L-H, Luo H-L, et al. Randomised phase III trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with extended nodal irradiation and erlotinib in patients with inoperable oesophageal squamous cell cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2018;93:99-107. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2018.01.085
      • 61
        Weickhardt AJ, Scheier B, Burke JM, et al. Local ablative therapy of oligoprogressive disease prolongs disease control by tyrosine kinase inhibitors in oncogene-addicted non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol Off Publ Int Assoc Study Lung Cancer. 2012;7(12):1807-1814. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182745948
      • 62
        Gan GN, Weickhardt AJ, Scheier B, et al. Stereotactic radiation therapy can safely and durably control sites of extra-central nervous system oligoprogressive disease in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive lung cancer patients receiving crizotinib. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88(4):892-898. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.010
      • 63
        Borghetti P, Bonù ML, Roca E, et al. Radiotherapy and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-life Experience. In Vivo. 2018;32(1):159-164. doi:10.21873/invivo.11219
      • 64
        Pan D, Wang B, Zhou X, Wang D. Clinical study on gefitinib combined with γ-ray stereotactic body radiation therapy as the first-line treatment regimen for senile patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung (final results of JLY20080085). Mol Clin Oncol. 2013;1(4):711-715. doi:10.3892/mco.2013.135
      • 65
        Swaminath A, Wright JR, Tsakiridis TK, et al. A Phase II Trial of Erlotinib and Concurrent Palliative Thoracic Radiation for Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016;17(2):142-149. doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2015.09.008
      • 66
        Hapani S, Chu D, Wu S. Risk of gastrointestinal perforation in patients with cancer treated with bevacizumab: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(6):559-568. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70112-3
      • 67
        Barney BM, Markovic SN, Laack NN, et al. Increased bowel toxicity in patients treated with a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor (VEGFI) after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87(1):73-80. doi:
      • 68
        Peters NAJB, Richel DJ, Verhoeff JJC, Stalpers LJA. Bowel perforation after radiotherapy in a patient receiving sorafenib. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2008;26(14):2405-2406. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.15.8451
      • 69
        Murray L, Longo J, Wan J, et al. Phase I dose escalation study of concurrent palliative radiation therapy with sorafenib in three anatomical cohorts (Thorax, Abdomen, Pelvis): The TAP study. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 2017;124(1):74-79. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2017.06.007
      • 70
        Goody RB, Brade AM, Wang L, et al. Phase I trial of radiation therapy and sorafenib in unresectable liver metastases. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 2017;123(2):234-239. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2017.01.018
      • 71
        Brade AM, Ng S, Brierley J, et al. Phase 1 Trial of Sorafenib and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;94(3):580-587. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.11.048
      • 72
        Tong CCL, Ko EC, Sung MW, et al. Phase II trial of concurrent sunitinib and image-guided radiotherapy for oligometastases. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e36979. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036979
      • 73
        Staehler M, Haseke N, Nuhn P, et al. Simultaneous anti-angiogenic therapy and single-fraction radiosurgery in clinically relevant metastases from renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2011;108(5):673-678. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09895.x
      • 74
        Meattini I, Desideri I, Scotti V, Simontacchi G, Livi L. Ribociclib plus letrozole and concomitant palliative radiotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Breast. 2018;42:1-2. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2018.08.096
      • 75
        Kawamoto T, Shikama N, Sasai K. Severe acute radiation-induced enterocolitis after combined palbociclib and palliative radiotherapy treatment. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 2019;131:240-241. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2018.09.020
      • 76
        Hans S, Cottu P, Kirova YM. Preliminary results of the association of Palbociclib and radiotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 2018;126(1):181. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.010
      • 77
        Kalash R, Iarrobino NA, Beriwal S, Sun M, Glaser SM, Champ CE. Palbociclib Enhances Pulmonary Fibrosis in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Radiation Therapy: A Case Series and Review of the Literature. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;102(3):e610. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.1673
      • 78
        Chowdhary M, Sen N, Chowdhary A, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Palbociclib and Radiation Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Initial Results of a Novel Combination. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019;4(3):453-457. doi:10.1016/j.adro.2019.03.011
      • 79
        Ippolito E, Greco C, Silipigni S, et al. Concurrent radiotherapy with palbociclib or ribociclib for metastatic breast cancer patients: Preliminary assessment of toxicity. Breast. 2019;46:70-74. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2019.05.001
      • 80
        Messer JA, Ekinci E, Patel TA, Teh BS. Enhanced dermatologic toxicity following concurrent treatment with palbociclib and radiation therapy: A case report. Reports Pract Oncol Radiother J Gt Cancer Cent Pozn Polish Soc Radiat Oncol. 2019;24(3):276-280. doi:10.1016/j.rpor.2019.03.001
      • 81
        Kim KN, Shah P, Clark A, et al. Safety of cyclin-dependent kinase4/6 inhibitor combined with palliative radiotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast. 2021;60:163-167. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2021.10.001
      • 82
        Beddok A, Xu HP, Henry AA, et al. Concurrent use of palbociclib and radiation therapy: single-centre experience and review of the literature. Br J Cancer. 2020;123(6):905-908. doi:10.1038/s41416-020-0957-9
      • 83
        Norman H, Lee KT, Stearns V, Alcorn SR, Mangini NS. Incidence and Severity of Myelosuppression With Palbociclib After Palliative Bone Radiation in Advanced Breast Cancer: A Single Center Experience and Review of Literature. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022;22(1):e65-e73. doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2021.07.013
      • 84
        Guerini AE, Pedretti S, Salah E, et al. A single-center retrospective safety analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors concurrent with radiation therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13589. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-70430-2
      • 85
        Ratosa I, Orazem M, Scoccimarro E, et al. Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors Combined With Radiotherapy for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2020;20(6):495-502. doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2020.05.013
      • 86
        Dasgupta A, Sahgal A, Warner E, Czarnota GJ. Safety of palbociclib concurrent with palliative pelvic radiotherapy: discussion of a case of increased toxicity and brief review of literature. J Med Radiat Sci. 2021;68(1):96-102. doi:10.1002/jmrs.435
      • 87
        Lee C-L, Oh P, Xu ES, et al. Blocking Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 During Single Dose Versus Fractionated Radiation Therapy Leads to Opposite Effects on Acute Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Mice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;102(5):1569-1576. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.192
      • 88
        Hwang WL, Pike LRG, Royce TJ, Mahal BA, Loeffler JS. Safety of combining radiotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibition. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(8):477-494. doi:10.1038/s41571-018-0046-7
      • 89
        Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, et al. Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(20):1919-1929. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1709937
      • 90
        Shaverdian N, Lisberg AE, Bornazyan K, et al. Previous radiotherapy and the clinical activity and toxicity of pembrolizumab in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a secondary analysis of the KEYNOTE-001 phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(7):895-903. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30380-7
      • 91
        Hwang WL, Niemierko A, Hwang KL, et al. Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Lung Cancer Treated With PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors and Thoracic Radiotherapy. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(2):253-255. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3808
      • 92
        Peters S, Felip E, Dafni U, et al. Progression-Free and Overall Survival for Concurrent Nivolumab With Standard Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Stage IIIA-B NSCLC: Results From the European Thoracic Oncology Platform NICOLAS Phase II Trial (European Thoracic Oncology Plat. J Thorac Oncol Off Publ Int Assoc Study Lung Cancer. 2021;16(2):278-288. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2020.10.129
      • 93
        Luke JJ, Lemons JM, Karrison TG, et al. Safety and Clinical Activity of Pembrolizumab and Multisite Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(16):1611-1618. doi:
      • 94
        Mattes MD, Eubank TD, Almubarak M, et al. A Prospective Trial Evaluating the Safety and Systemic Response From the Concurrent Use of Radiation Therapy with Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2021;22(4):268-273. doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2021.01.012
      • 95
        Theelen WSME, Peulen HMU, Lalezari F, et al. Effect of Pembrolizumab After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Pembrolizumab Alone on Tumor Response in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results of the PEMBRO-RT Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(9):1276-1282. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1478
      • 96
        Chao J, He T-F, D'Apuzzo M, et al. A Phase 2 Trial Combining Pembrolizumab and Palliative Radiation Therapy in Gastroesophageal Cancer to Augment Abscopal Immune Responses. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022;7(1):100807. doi:10.1016/j.adro.2021.100807
      • 97
        Barker CA, Postow MA, Khan SA, et al. Concurrent radiotherapy and ipilimumab immunotherapy for patients with melanoma. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013;1(2):92-98. doi:10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0082
      • 98
        Liniker E, Menzies AM, Kong BY, et al. Activity and safety of radiotherapy with anti-PD-1 drug therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5(9):e1214788. doi:10.1080/2162402X.2016.1214788
      • 99
        Qin R, Olson A, Singh B, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Radiation Therapy in Advanced Melanoma Patients Treated With Ipilimumab. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96(1):72-77. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.04.017
      • 100
        Bang A, Wilhite TJ, Pike LRG, et al. Multicenter Evaluation of the Tolerability of Combined Treatment With PD-1 and CTLA-4 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Palliative Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98(2):344-351. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.003
      • 101
        Postow MA, Knox SJ, Goldman DA, et al. A Prospective, Phase 1 Trial of Nivolumab, Ipilimumab, and Radiotherapy in Patients with Advanced Melanoma. Clin cancer Res an Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2020;26(13):3193-3201. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3936
      • 102
        Hiniker SM, Reddy SA, Maecker HT, et al. A Prospective Clinical Trial Combining Radiation Therapy With Systemic Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96(3):578-588. doi:
      • 103
        Kwon ED, Drake CG, Scher HI, et al. Ipilimumab versus placebo after radiotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that had progressed after docetaxel chemotherapy (CA184-043): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(7):700-712. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70189-5
      • 104
        Tang C, Welsh JW, de Groot P, et al. Ipilimumab with Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: Phase I Results and Immunologic Correlates from Peripheral T Cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(6):1388-1396. doi:
      • 105
        Welsh JW, Tang C, de Groot P, et al. Phase II Trial of Ipilimumab with Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Disease: Outcomes, Toxicities, and Low-Dose Radiation-Related Abscopal Responses. Cancer Immunol Res. 2019;7(12):1903-1909. doi:
      • 106
        Bristol-Myers. Yervoy (ipilimumab) package insert. Published 2013. Accessed August 17, 2021.
      • 107
        Fiorica F, Belluomini L, Stefanelli A, et al. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Nivolumab and Radiotherapy in Pretreated Lung Cancer Patients: Efficacy and Safety of Combination. Am J Clin Oncol. 2018;41(11):1101-1105. doi:10.1097/COC.0000000000000428
      • 108
        Amin NP, Zainib M, Parker SM, Agarwal M, Mattes MD. Multi-institutional report on toxicities of concurrent nivolumab and radiation therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018;3(3):399-404. doi:10.1016/j.adro.2018.04.015
      • 109
        McBride S, Sherman E, Tsai CJ, et al. Randomized Phase II Trial of Nivolumab With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Nivolumab Alone in Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(1):30-37. doi:
      • 110
        Aboudaram A, Modesto A, Chaltiel L, et al. Concurrent radiotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma and receiving anti-programmed-death 1 therapy: a safe and effective combination. Melanoma Res. 2017;27(5):485-491. doi:10.1097/CMR.0000000000000386
      • 111
        Saito S, Abe T, Iino M, et al. Incidence and risk factors for pneumonitis among patients with lung cancer who received immune checkpoint inhibitors after palliative thoracic radiotherapy. J Radiat Res. 2021;62(4):669-675. doi:10.1093/jrr/rrab051
      • 112
        Shibaki R, Akamatsu H, Fujimoto M, Koh Y, Yamamoto N. Nivolumab induced radiation recall pneumonitis after two years of radiotherapy. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2017;28(6):1404-1405. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx115
      • 113
        Levêque D, Gigou L, Bergerat JP. Clinical pharmacology of trastuzumab. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2008;3(1):51-55. doi:10.2174/157488408783329931
      • 114
        Ajgal Z, de Percin S, Dieras V, et al. Combination of radiotherapy and double blockade HER2 with pertuzumab and trastuzumab for HER2-positive metastatic or locally recurrent unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer: Assessment of early toxicity. Cancer Radiother. 2017;21(2):114-118. doi:
      • 115
        Advani PP, Ballman K V, Dockter TJ, Colon-Otero G, Perez EA. Long-Term Cardiac Safety Analysis of NCCTG N9831 (Alliance) Adjuvant Trastuzumab Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(6):581-587. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.61.8413
      • 116
        Ganz PA, Romond EH, Cecchini RS, et al. Long-Term Follow-Up of Cardiac Function and Quality of Life for Patients in NSABP Protocol B-31/NRG Oncology: A Randomized Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide (AC) Followed by Paclitaxel With AC Followed by Paclitax. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(35):3942-3948. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.74.1165
      • 117
        Horton JK, Halle J, Ferraro M, et al. Radiosensitization of chemotherapy-refractory, locally advanced or locally recurrent breast cancer with trastuzumab: a phase II trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(4):998-1004. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.027
      • 118
        Dackus GMHE, Jóźwiak K, van der Wall E, et al. Concurrent versus sequential use of trastuzumab and chemotherapy in early HER2+ breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021;185(3):817-830. doi:10.1007/s10549-020-05978-8
      • 119
        Jacob J, Belin L, Pierga JY, et al. Concurrent administration of trastuzumab with locoregional breast radiotherapy: long-term results of a prospective study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;148(2):345-353. doi:10.1007/s10549-014-3166-5
      • 120
        Halyard MY, Pisansky TM, Dueck AC, et al. Radiotherapy and adjuvant trastuzumab in operable breast cancer: tolerability and adverse event data from the NCCTG Phase III Trial N9831. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2009;27(16):2638-2644. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9549
      • 121
        Safran H, Dipetrillo T, Akerman P, et al. Phase I/II study of trastuzumab, paclitaxel, cisplatin and radiation for locally advanced, HER2 overexpressing, esophageal adenocarcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67(2):405-409. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.08.076
      • 122
        Safran H, Winter KA, Wigle DA, et al. Trastuzumab with trimodality treatment for esophageal adenocarcinoma with HER2 overexpression: NRG Oncology/RTOG 1010. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15_suppl):4500. doi:10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.4500
      • 123
        De Santis MC, Bonfantini F, Di Salvo F, et al. Trastuzumab and Hypofractionated Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Victorious Combination? Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18(3):e363-e371. doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2017.08.011
      • 124
        Katz DA, Abrams RA, Sclamberg JS, Usha L. Radiosensitizing effect of anti-HER2/neu agents: Report of 2 cases and review of the literature. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015;5(2):e61-5. doi:10.1016/j.prro.2014.06.006
      • 125
        Kimple RJ, Horton JK, Livasy CA, et al. Phase I study and biomarker analysis of lapatinib and concurrent radiation for locally advanced breast cancer. Oncologist. 2012;17(12):1496-1503. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0256
      • 126
        Shepard G, Arrowsmith ER, Murphy P, et al. A Phase II Study with Lead-In Safety Cohort of 5-Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, and Lapatinib in Combination with Radiation Therapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Patients with Localized HER2-Positive Esophagogastric Adenocarcinomas. Oncologist. 2017;22(10):1152-e98. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0186
      • 127
        Harrington K, Berrier A, Robinson M, et al. Randomised Phase II study of oral lapatinib combined with chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: rationale for future randomised trials in human papilloma virus-negative disease. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(7):1609-1618. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2012.11.023
      • 128
        Harrington K, Temam S, Mehanna H, et al. Postoperative Adjuvant Lapatinib and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Maintenance Lapatinib Monotherapy in High-Risk Patients With Resected Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled St. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2015;33(35):4202-4209. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.61.4370
      • 129
        Krop IE, Suter TM, Dang CT, et al. Feasibility and cardiac safety of trastuzumab emtansine after anthracycline-based chemotherapy as (neo)adjuvant therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2015;33(10):1136-1142. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.58.7782
      • 130
        von Minckwitz G, Huang C-S, Mano MS, et al. Trastuzumab Emtansine for Residual Invasive HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Fein L Lerzo G, Egle D, Greil R, Hubalek M, Singer C, Steger G, Dirix L, Duhoux F, Jerusalem G, Renard V, Araujo R, Boukai A, Hegg R, Lima JP, Mano M, Morelle A, Muller AP, Paiva CE, Pedrini JL, Pinczowski H, Santos L, Teich NL, Testa L, Wiermann E, Basi KL, ed. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(7):617-628. doi:
      • 131
        Corbin KS, Breen WG, Strauss JB. Radiation dermatitis in patients treated with concurrent trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2020;24:99-101. doi:10.1016/j.ctro.2020.06.013
      • 132
        Loibl S, Huang C-S, Mano MS, et al. 96O Adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) vs trastuzumab (T) in patients (pts) with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy for HER2+ breast cancer: Subgroup analysis from KATHERINE. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:S48. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.036
      • 133
        Zolcsák Z, Loirat D, Fourquet A, Kirova YM. Adjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) and Concurrent Radiotherapy for Residual Invasive HER2-positive Breast Cancer: Single-center Preliminary Results. Am J Clin Oncol. 2020;43(12):895-901. doi:10.1097/COC.0000000000000769
      • 134
        Piroth MD, Krug D, Sedlmayer F, et al. Post-neoadjuvant treatment with capecitabine and trastuzumab emtansine in breast cancer patients-sequentially, or better simultaneously? Strahlenther Onkol. 2021;197(1):1-7. doi:10.1007/s00066-020-01667-z

      Appendix. Supplementary materials